It has become very tempting and often intuitive to raise Bible questions into AI, like ChatGPT or Grok. In doing so, AI will analyse all available, uploaded and trained information to textually analyse the question and base its answer on the wide variety of interpretations, often using the majority view in the answer. In order to avoid existing common beliefs and doctrines, AI needs to be conditioned to analyse Bible texts in a strict framework. I have instructed my AI accounts to adhere to the following, strict parameters.
Base the answer on:
- Observational analysis (what the text actually says)
- Strict logical sequencing
- Mathematical / probabilistic reasoning
- Biblical symbolism and internal cross-reference
- King James Version (KJV) text only
AI may not:
- Default to modern translations
- Appeal to tradition, creed, or consensus
- Import doctrinal assumptions
Exception (only if I ask)
- Other translations may be cited solely for comparison, contrast, or linguistic clarification — and only when you explicitly state that purpose
This gives a closed system of answering:
- One textual base (KJV)
- One interpretive discipline
- No moving goalposts
There is in concept nothing holding you back to find out what the traditional views contain, but if you want an precise analysis of the text, this framework is a good start to limit AI’s framework of answering.
Where applicable, I will start including AI’s interpretation and analysis of documents on this website.
